The possessive dative construction has been widely adopted as an unaccusativity diagnostic (Borer and Grodzinsky 1986). Gafter (2014) casts doubt on the relevance of unaccusativity to the acceptability of the construction. We conducted a series of acceptability judgment experiments to investigate the validity of the possessive dative construction as an unaccusativity diagnostic, controlling for possible confounds such as animacy, definiteness, plausibility, lexical choice, type of possession, and context salience. The experiments revealed that possessive datives are significantly more acceptable with unaccusative verbs than with unergatives, including reflexive and emission verbs. We conclude that unaccusatives, but not unergatives, are grammatical in the construction, and we defend a structural account of the data.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
August 30 2024
The Relevance of Unaccusativity to Possessive Datives
In Special Collection:
CogNet
Ziv Plotnik,
Ziv Plotnik
Department of Linguistics, UCLA, zivplotnik@gmail.com
Search for other works by this author on:
Aya Meltzer-Asscher,
Aya Meltzer-Asscher
Department of Linguistics and Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, ameltzer@tauex.tau.ac.il
Search for other works by this author on:
Tal Siloni
Tal Siloni
Department of Linguistics and Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, siloni@tauex.tau.ac.il
Search for other works by this author on:
Ziv Plotnik
Department of Linguistics, UCLA, zivplotnik@gmail.com
Aya Meltzer-Asscher
Department of Linguistics and Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, ameltzer@tauex.tau.ac.il
Tal Siloni
Department of Linguistics and Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, siloni@tauex.tau.ac.il
Online ISSN: 1530-9150
Print ISSN: 0024-3892
© 2024 by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
2024
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Linguistic Inquiry 1–29.
Citation
Ziv Plotnik, Aya Meltzer-Asscher, Tal Siloni; The Relevance of Unaccusativity to Possessive Datives. Linguistic Inquiry 2024; doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00532
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Captcha Validation Error. Please try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionEmail alerts
40
Views
Advertisement
Cited By
Related Articles
The Role of the Absolutive Object in Morphological Accessibility
Linguistic Inquiry (June,2021)
The Lexicon-Syntax Parameter: Reflexivization and Other Arity Operations
Linguistic Inquiry (July,2005)
Breaking Agreements: Distinguishing Agreement and Clitic Doubling by Their Failures
Linguistic Inquiry (October,2009)
On the Nature of Long-Distance Anaphors
Linguistic Inquiry (March,2007)