Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Update search
NARROW
Format
Journal
Date
Availability
1-3 of 3
Roni Setton
Close
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Sort by
Journal Articles
Publisher: Journals Gateway
Network Neuroscience (2024) 8 (3): 860–882.
Published: 01 October 2024
FIGURES
| View All (5)
Abstract
View article
PDF
Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) investigations have provided a view of the default network (DN) as composed of a specific set of frontal, parietal, and temporal cortical regions. This spatial topography is typically defined with reference to an influential network parcellation scheme that designated the DN as one of seven large-scale networks ( Yeo et al., 2011 ). However, the precise functional organization of the DN is still under debate, with studies arguing for varying subnetwork configurations and the inclusion of subcortical regions. In this vein, the so-called limbic network—defined as a distinct large-scale network comprising the bilateral temporal poles, ventral anterior temporal lobes, and orbitofrontal cortex—is of particular interest. A large multi-modal and multi-species literature on the anatomical, functional, and cognitive properties of these regions suggests a close relationship to the DN. Notably, these regions have poor signal quality with conventional fMRI acquisition, likely obscuring their network affiliation in most studies. Here, we leverage a multi-echo fMRI dataset with high temporal signal-to-noise and whole-brain coverage, including orbitofrontal and anterior temporal regions, to examine the large-scale network resting-state functional connectivity of these regions and assess their associations with the DN. Consistent with our hypotheses, our results support the inclusion of the majority of the orbitofrontal and anterior temporal cortex as part of the DN and reveal significant heterogeneity in their functional connectivity. We observed that left-lateralized regions within the temporal poles and ventral anterior temporal lobes, as well as medial orbitofrontal regions, exhibited the greatest resting-state functional connectivity with the DN, with heterogeneity across DN subnetworks. Overall, our findings suggest that, rather than being a functionally distinct network, the orbitofrontal and anterior temporal regions comprise part of a larger, extended default network. Author Summary The precise functional organization of the default network is still under debate. Limitations in temporal signal-to-noise of functional MRI BOLD signal data may have restricted estimations of the topography of the default network. The “limbic network,” defined as a distinct large-scale network comprising bilateral anterior temporal and orbitofrontal cortex, has been affiliated with the default network in nonhuman animal tractography and task-based fMRI studies in humans. We leverage a multi-echo fMRI dataset with high temporal signal-to-noise and whole-brain coverage to examine the large-scale network resting-state functional connectivity of these regions and assess their associations with the default network. Our results support the inclusion of anterior temporal and orbitofrontal cortex as part of the default network. Overall, our findings suggest that, rather than being a functionally distinct limbic network, the anterior temporal and orbitofrontal regions comprise part of an extended default network.
Includes: Supplementary data
Journal Articles
Publisher: Journals Gateway
Network Neuroscience (2023) 7 (3): 1022–1033.
Published: 01 October 2023
FIGURES
Abstract
View article
PDF
The neuroscience of creativity seeks to disentangle the complex brain processes that underpin the generation of novel ideas. Neuroimaging studies of functional connectivity, particularly functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), have revealed individual differences in brain network organization associated with creative ability; however, much of the extant research is limited to laboratory-based divergent thinking measures. To overcome these limitations, we compare functional brain connectivity in a cohort of creative experts ( n = 27) and controls ( n = 26) and examine links with creative behavior. First, we replicate prior findings showing reduced connectivity in visual cortex related to higher creative performance. Second, we examine whether this result is driven by integrated or segregated connectivity. Third, we examine associations between functional connectivity and vivid distal simulation separately in creative experts and controls. In accordance with past work, our results show reduced connectivity to the primary visual cortex in creative experts at rest. Additionally, we observe a negative association between distal simulation vividness and connectivity to the lateral visual cortex in creative experts. Taken together, these results highlight connectivity profiles of highly creative people and suggest that creative thinking may be related to, though not fully redundant with, the ability to vividly imagine the future. Author Summary This study sought to uncover the neurocognitive basis of creativity by comparing brain connectivity in a cohort of creative experts and controls. Using graph theory methods, we replicate past work showing reduced connectivity to the primary visual cortex in highly creative people. Additionally, we observed a negative association between vividness of distal future simulation and connectivity to the lateral visual cortex in creative experts. Taken together, these findings highlight connectivity profiles of highly creative people and suggest that creative thinking may be related to the ability to vividly imagine events in the distant future.
Includes: Supplementary data
Journal Articles
Publisher: Journals Gateway
Network Neuroscience (2023) 7 (2): 496–521.
Published: 30 June 2023
FIGURES
| View All (4)
Abstract
View article
PDF
Author Summary Feelings of loneliness emerge when a person’s desire or need for an interpersonal relationship is unmet. This state of perceived social isolation can influence social-cognitive processes that are critical for connecting with others, such as empathy. Neuroimaging studies have shown diverging functional connectivity patterns among functional brain networks between lonely younger and middle-aged adults. Here, we take a targeted approach to directly assess age-related differences in functional connectivity associated with loneliness and empathic responding in younger and older adults. We find evidence that individual differences in functional connectivity related to loneliness and empathic responding differ with age. We discuss possible mechanisms underlying these associations and their implications for brain and social functioning across the adult life-span. Abstract Loneliness is associated with differences in resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) within and between large-scale networks in early- and middle-aged adult cohorts. However, age-related changes in associations between sociality and brain function into late adulthood are not well understood. Here, we examined age differences in the association between two dimensions of sociality—loneliness and empathic responding—and RSFC of the cerebral cortex. Self-report measures of loneliness and empathy were inversely related across the entire sample of younger (mean age = 22.6y, n = 128) and older (mean age = 69.0y, n = 92) adults. Using multivariate analyses of multi-echo fMRI RSFC, we identified distinct functional connectivity patterns for individual and age group differences associated with loneliness and empathic responding. Loneliness in young and empathy in both age groups was related to greater visual network integration with association networks (e.g., default, fronto-parietal control). In contrast, loneliness was positively related to within- and between-network integration of association networks for older adults. These results extend our previous findings in early- and middle-aged cohorts, demonstrating that brain systems associated with loneliness, as well as empathy, differ in older age. Further, the findings suggest that these two aspects of social experience engage different neurocognitive processes across human life-span development.
Includes: Supplementary data